Times Herald-Record
does it itself with cutdown
Faced with a budget crunch,
crews at the N.Y. paper complete web reduction, in process saving paper hundreds
of thousands of dollars.
By Chuck Moozakis
Editor-In-Chief
Like many
U.S. newspapers, the Times Herald-Record in Middletown, N.Y., reduced its web
width in a bid to shrink consumables costs.
But unlike most papers with
doublewide presses, the Times Herald-Record did the press cutdown itself, saving
hundreds of thousands of dollars in the process, according to Frederick J.
Stanton III, production director.

Photo: Times Herald-Record
Steve Stone (front), Times Herald-Record’s pressroom tech supervisor,
with Fred Stanton, production director, beginning the folder changeover.
“We decided we had enough
expertise in-house to put a plan in place and perform the cutdown ourselves,” he
said of the project, which began in early 2007 and ended Jan. 1, when the
redesigned tab debuted with a height of 14 inches, two inches shorter than its
former size. Page width remained unchanged, at 11 3/8-inches.
“We have talented press techs,
an enthusiastic press crew and I spent 25 years in the pressroom prior to
becoming production director,” Stanton said.
More cost-effective
Stanton said the cost for
materials and necessary machining of the Times Herald-Record’s two Goss
International Corp. Metroliner presses amounted to about $100,000. Even when
adding personnel costs, the total price for the reduction was much less than the
$750,000 to $1.5 million quotes the paper received from contractors, Stanton
said.
Using funds efficiently was
particularly critical to the paper because the web reduction came on the heels
of hefty investments the Times Herald-Record made last year installing digital
page packs, converting to computer-to-plate and upgrading controls, Stanton said
(see “Times Herald Record swapping out press controls,” Newspapers & Technology,
July 2007).
“There was no capital for a
web-width reduction,” he said.
Stanton began to lay the
groundwork for the reduction last spring, giving crews ample time to modify the
presses without jeopardizing normal production.
The machines’ mid-1980s
components benefited the project. “We had some luck on our side,” Stanton said,
citing in part the presses’ double 3:2 Goss Imperial folders.
Folder modification
“The folder, which in these
projects is usually the most difficult, was relatively easy to retrofit,” he
said, adding that the folders’ expansion band placement and impaling pins were
already situated to accommodate numerous web widths, as were nipping rollers,
trolleys and slitters.
On the units, press mechanics
tweaked the existing Glunz & Jensen K&F Inc. lockups to handle the new width and
lockup bars were modified as well. Other changes were made to the technotrans
spraybar dampeners and RTPs as well as to the press’ RTFs and former boards.
After the pre-engineering was
completed, crews Dec. 31 put the finishing touches on the cutdown, following the
production of that day’s edition.
A crew of seven was assigned
the task of completing the project. Two were assigned to work on the folders
while another pair worked on the lockups. Two others modified the ink forms and
the seventh retrofit benders and other equipment in the plateroom, anchored by
equipment from Agfa and GJKF.
Old paper gone
“After 17 hours of work, the
night press crew was in and hanging the new-sized plates,” Stanton said. The
16-inch-tall Times Herald-Record was now a memory, replaced by the smaller-sized
product.
“The press run on both presses
went flawlessly and all the credit goes to the expertise and enthusiasm of our
press crew,” he said.
With the resized Times
Herald-Record now five months old, Stanton said he’s seen improved print quality
as well as reduced consumables costs as a result of the narrower web.
He said the paper should be
able to knock off as much as $500,000 from its annual newsprint costs; and the
other changes, such as the deployment of the Controls Group Inc. digital inkers,
are contributing to bottom-line savings as well.